[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cp-patches] RFC: checking for socklen_t
|
From: |
Christian Thalinger |
|
Subject: |
Re: [cp-patches] RFC: checking for socklen_t |
|
Date: |
Mon, 02 Jan 2006 13:08:51 +0100 |
On Sun, 2006-01-01 at 23:42 +0100, Andreas Tobler wrote:
> Well, he hasn't yet, but I'll add my comment here.
>
> I'd like to see it as an unsigned int and not an int. Most systems I
> know use unsigned int for socklen_t. Posix.1g also recommends to use
> uint32_t for socklen_t.
Well, on this very special OS not even uint32_t is defined. So i'd vote
for `unsigned int' if you think we should use unsigned.
TWISTI