Re: [cp-patches] RFC: checking for socklen_t

[Christian Thalinger]

On Sun, 2006-01-01 at 15:24 -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
> Twisti> +  if test $ac_cv_type_socklen_t != yes; then
> Twisti> +    AC_DEFINE(socklen_t, int, [Substitute for socklen_t])
> Twisti> +  fi
> 
> Kind of a bogus approach (better to use a real typedef), but whatever.

That's true, yes.  I'll commit it like this and we can change that.  But
i think it will not happen for many users, except me :-)

TWISTI