[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Classpath future?
|
From: |
Aaron M. Renn |
|
Subject: |
Re: Classpath future? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 12 Jul 2001 13:40:16 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
Etienne M. Gagnon (address@hidden) wrote:
> > As a GNU project, it is then appropriate for us to provide
> > a heightened level of support for that target environment, so long as
> > it doesn't preclude other people from using us.
>
> This is fine, as long as you make sure JNI support doesn't lag behind,
> and no classes are added with a CNI counterpart and no JNI counter part.
Right now it is just the opposite. Classpath is 100% JNI. The only
CNI code resides in the libgcj modules that have not been merged in.
--
Aaron M. Renn (address@hidden) http://www.urbanophile.com/arenn/
- Classpath future?, Etienne M. Gagnon, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Aaron M. Renn, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, John Keiser, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Aaron M. Renn, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Etienne M. Gagnon, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?,
Aaron M. Renn <=
- Re: Classpath future?, Etienne M. Gagnon, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Brian Jones, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Tom Tromey, 2001/07/12
- CNI, Paul Fisher, 2001/07/12
- Re: Classpath future?, Tom Tromey, 2001/07/12
Re: Classpath future?, Jeff Sturm, 2001/07/12