RE: gij as JRE 5

[Jeroen Frijters]

Andrew Haley wrote:
> Jeroen Frijters writes:
>  > Andrew Haley wrote:
>  > > Make 1.5 bytecode a reqiurement for the 1.0 branch.
>  > 
>  > I don't understand what you mean by this. Supporting 1.5 
> bytecode in the
>  > VM is trivial, but we don't have any 1.5 source compilers 
> yet, do we?
> 
> Sorry, I thought it was clear.  Tom said "Here are the minimal changes
> required to support 1.5 bytecode", and that's what I was referring to.

I don't understand how the two are related. If we make supporting 1.5
bytecode a requirement for GNU Classpath 1.0, what would that buy us
without actually having a 1.5 capable compiler and using the 1.5
features in the Classpath sources?

Regards,
Jeroen