[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Dchub-dev] [support #102365] kick/ban function changes
From: |
nobody |
Subject: |
[Dchub-dev] [support #102365] kick/ban function changes |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Aug 2003 02:02:05 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686) Gecko/20030428 Galeon/1.3.3 |
Support Request #102365, was updated on Wed 08/20/2003 at 22:24
You can respond by visiting:
http://savannah.nongnu.org/support/?func=detailsupport&support_id=102365&group_id=3963
Category: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Summary: kick/ban function changes
By: ericprev
Date: Sun 08/24/2003 at 08:02
Logged In: YES
user_id=15899
Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686) Gecko/20030428 Galeon/1.3.3
I don't agree. If you check the -kick/-skick and -bankick
functions, at the end, you will see they both call
proceed_user_kick, they just use different parameters. The
displayed message is a bit different ("is kicking" vs "is
banning") and while -kick uses a key to have the duration of
the ban, -bankick accept the parameter directly within the
command. I think -kick is just a degenerated version of
-bankick.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
By: blusseau
Date: Fri 08/22/2003 at 22:48
Logged In: YES
user_id=15884
Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; Q312461; .NET CLR
1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
I don't agree with you.
I think it's a bad thing: for example how can i ban someone
for 1h ?
Time can't be used to distinguish between kick or ban.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
http://savannah.nongnu.org/support/?func=detailsupport&support_id=102365&group_id=3963
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.nongnu.org/