Re: [dev-serveez] solaris build

[stefan]

On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Raimi 'Raimi' Jacob wrote:

> > Maybe we could inhibit the warning by using
> > '-L/usr/gnu/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/2.95.3 -lgcc'?  I'll give it
> > a try and check it into CVS.  This is because I think libtool recognises
> > static archives by thefile extension ".a".  I conclude this because
> > libtool does not complain about the "libiberty.a" which is a static
> > library, too.
> 
> > > ... this message isnt really a surprise but i think we dont have to care
> > > (since the explicit link is dynamically created).
> > I agree, actually we do not need to care.
> 
> so? change and check ? or just leave it as it is ? i dont care about the
> warning. since gcc --print ... is somehow guaranteed to work, i'd rather
> use this thatn -L..... -lgcc (might introduce other trouble).

Just checked in some work around.  Can you please test it once more?

> bottom line: Risc code is usually bigger than Cisc code.

Ah, forgot about that... thanks for clarification

Cheers,
        address@hidden