|
From: | Usman Haider |
Subject: | Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] FEC: Convolutional Encoder Gnuradio and Matlab: different results |
Date: | Wed, 22 Mar 2017 19:14:35 +0500 |
Hi together,
I’m using the FEC Async Encoder with the CC Encoder Definition. Input/Output are unpacked and I use the terminated behavior. In Gnuradio the polynomials for the CC Encoder Definition are defined on a base of 10, and not as octals like in MATLAB, right?
I tried the following: 1 bit with ‘1’ as input to the FEC Async Encoder and the same in MATLAB to check the response of the encoder. The results don’t match. No matter if I use different constraint lengths, rates or polynomials.
e.g. in Matlab: K = 7, 1/R=2, Polynomials (octal) [171,133] and Gnuradio Polynomials (10-base) [121,91] give completely different outputs.
No matter what I do, e.g., using octal representation in Gnuradio, or changing the polynomials’ positions in the specified vector, gives me a result which matches.
Did anyone compare results before? Any clues?
Regards,
Emanuel
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |