[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Debian and SimplyGNUstep
From: |
Vaisburd, Haim |
Subject: |
RE: Debian and SimplyGNUstep |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Oct 2003 13:20:45 -0700 |
Eric Heintzmann <eric@gnustep.fr.st> wrote:
> It will be an empty package with a debconf entry which ask to users if
> they want symlinks to GNUstep Domains, and if yes, where to add these
> links ( for example: /, /GNUstep, /usr/GNUstep ... ).
> I m not sure that non LHS stuff can be accepted in debian...
What's the story and problem with /opt ?
I've thought it is allowed in Linux FHS and is good for packages that
do not fit into, let's say, standard separation of bin/lib/include.
GNUstep compiles by default into it (/opt/GNUstep).
It seems to me like a natural place for existing distributions.
What do you think?
Tima.
- Re: Debian and SimplyGNUstep, (continued)
- Re: Debian and SimplyGNUstep, oberhage, 2003/10/10
- Re: Debian and SimplyGNUstep, Martin Herbert Dietze, 2003/10/10
- Re: Debian and SimplyGNUstep, Jeff Teunissen, 2003/10/11
- Re: Debian and SimplyGNUstep, Martin Brecher, 2003/10/12
- Re: Debian and SimplyGNUstep, Chad Hardin, 2003/10/12
- Re: Debian and SimplyGNUstep, Dennis Leeuw, 2003/10/13
- Re: Debian and SimplyGNUstep, Enrico Sersale, 2003/10/13
- Message not available
- Re: Debian and SimplyGNUstep, oberhage, 2003/10/13
Re: Debian and SimplyGNUstep, Björn Giesler, 2003/10/10
RE: Debian and SimplyGNUstep,
Vaisburd, Haim <=
RE: Debian and SimplyGNUstep, Vaisburd, Haim, 2003/10/10
RE: Debian and SimplyGNUstep, S.J.Chun, 2003/10/10
Re: Debian and SimplyGNUstep, Eric Heintzmann, 2003/10/11
Re: Debian and SimplyGNUstep, Eric Heintzmann, 2003/10/11
Re: Debian and SimplyGNUstep, oberhage, 2003/10/13