[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Debian and SimplyGNUstep
From: |
Matthias Klose |
Subject: |
Re: Debian and SimplyGNUstep |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Oct 2003 23:38:18 +0200 |
Eric Heintzmann writes:
> Vaisburd, Haim wrote:
> > Eric Heintzmann <eric@gnustep.fr.st> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>It will be an empty package with a debconf entry which ask to users if
> >>they want symlinks to GNUstep Domains, and if yes, where to add these
> >>links ( for example: /, /GNUstep, /usr/GNUstep ... ).
> >
> >
> >>I m not sure that non LHS stuff can be accepted in debian...
> >
> >
> > What's the story and problem with /opt ?
> >
> > I've thought it is allowed in Linux FHS and is good for packages that
> > do not fit into, let's say, standard separation of bin/lib/include.
> > GNUstep compiles by default into it (/opt/GNUstep).
> > It seems to me like a natural place for existing distributions.
> > What do you think?
"let's say" is a bit broad. The FHS defines this as "addon
packages". Debian decided not to ship anything in /opt. If you provide
packages/software, which are not distributed by Debian, then
/opt/GNUstep is a FHS-compliant location.
Matthias
- Re: Debian and SimplyGNUstep, (continued)
Re: Debian and SimplyGNUstep, Björn Giesler, 2003/10/10
RE: Debian and SimplyGNUstep, Vaisburd, Haim, 2003/10/10
RE: Debian and SimplyGNUstep, Vaisburd, Haim, 2003/10/10
RE: Debian and SimplyGNUstep, S.J.Chun, 2003/10/10
Re: Debian and SimplyGNUstep, Eric Heintzmann, 2003/10/11
- Re: Debian and SimplyGNUstep,
Matthias Klose <=
Re: Debian and SimplyGNUstep, Eric Heintzmann, 2003/10/11
Re: Debian and SimplyGNUstep, oberhage, 2003/10/13