[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality contr
From: |
Adam Fedor |
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control) |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Oct 2003 20:41:26 -0600 |
On Monday, October 20, 2003, at 01:22 AM, Philippe C.D. Robert wrote:
But to remain at least a little on-topic allow me to ask this question
(as a simple user resp. programmer who needs to decide whether to use
it or not): where will the GNUstep project be within 12 months (which
will be more or less GUI 1.0)? What is the (realistic) roadmap for the
GNUstep project anyway?
Well I've thought about that question a lot, obviously, but I don't
have a really good answer. Most of my goals revolve around the concept
of the GNUstep Desktop. That is, I can have a lot of individual goals
about the GNUstep development platform, but it's hard to know what's
really important without a consensus of what the "reference" GNUstep
Desktop would look like. Will it be "all GNUstep", with our own Window
Manager, or do we need to give up our small town mentality and try to
integrate better with KDE and/or Gnome. What are the really important
things that people want to accomplish with GNUstep?
I don't much care which way it goes. I've been working on GNUstep for
over 10 years now, and I just keep going for the fun of it, not because
I have any aspirations that it will become some wildly popular,
unbeatable project. My one hope is that it will be useful before it
becomes obsolete :-)
I have a few goals listed on the "Task List" at www.gnustep.org. Let me
know if you have any suggestions.
- Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control, (continued)
- Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control, Pascal J . Bourguignon, 2003/10/16
- Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control, Alexander Malmberg, 2003/10/17
- Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control, Philippe C.D. Robert, 2003/10/18
- Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control, nicolas, 2003/10/18
- Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control, Fred Kiefer, 2003/10/18
- Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control, Philippe C . D . Robert, 2003/10/19
- Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control, Fred Kiefer, 2003/10/19
- GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Philippe C . D . Robert, 2003/10/20
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control),
Adam Fedor <=
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Philip Mötteli, 2003/10/22
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Chad Hardin, 2003/10/22
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Rogelio M . Serrano Jr ., 2003/10/22
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Philip Mötteli, 2003/10/22
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Rogelio M . Serrano Jr ., 2003/10/22
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Helge Hess, 2003/10/22
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Philip Mötteli, 2003/10/22
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Chad Hardin, 2003/10/22
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Philip Mötteli, 2003/10/22
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Philippe C . D . Robert, 2003/10/22