[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality contr
From: |
Pete French |
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control) |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Oct 2003 22:00:10 +0100 |
> believe is lacking. I'm not talking about anything other than -Base or
> -AppKit here, Pete.
Hmm, O.K. - for some reason I was under the impression you were one
of the many moaning about the state of the apps rather than the core
API.
> probably within the month, but the presumption that everyone on this
> mailing list writes code shows me that you don't think anyone would
> possibly use GNUstep as a straight-up user, which gives me some insight
> into the way you see GNUstep.
I dont see how anyone can use it as a straight up user right now,
no - because there arent a full set of apps for anyone to be a straight
up users. What does a "straight up GNUstep user" do for a web browser
for example ? I strongly suspect theres no such thing - just a set of
people who mwould like there to be a full set of apps one day so they
can become straight-up users. When I will join them most likely. Until
then I dont believe theres any such thing as a straight-up user of
GNUstep, no. Only straight-up users of a few individual apps.
As to the way I see GNustep right now - I see it as a set of incomplete
libraries and a smattering of apps based on those. Is that a wrong way
to view the project ? Is it an incomplete way to view the current state
of the project ?
-bat.
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), (continued)
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Chris B. Vetter, 2003/10/22
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Alex Perez, 2003/10/22
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Pete French, 2003/10/23
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Banlu Kemiyatorn, 2003/10/23
- Roadmap: and now the positive side, Dennis Leeuw, 2003/10/23
- Re: Roadmap: and now the positive side, Chris B. Vetter, 2003/10/23
- Re: Roadmap: and now the positive side, Nicola Pero, 2003/10/23
- Re: Roadmap: and now the positive side, Chris B. Vetter, 2003/10/23
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Alex Perez, 2003/10/23
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2003/10/23
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control),
Pete French <=
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Helge Hess, 2003/10/23
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Alex Perez, 2003/10/23
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Nicola Pero, 2003/10/24
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for qualitycontrol), Jeff Teunissen, 2003/10/24
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for qualitycontrol), Jeff Teunissen, 2003/10/24
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Adam Fedor, 2003/10/23
- Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control, Ian Jones, 2003/10/16
- Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control, Dennis Leeuw, 2003/10/16
- Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control, Adam Fedor, 2003/10/16
Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control (WAS: Re: deferreddeallocation), Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf, 2003/10/17