[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Migration to Objective-C 2.0
|
From: |
Michael Hopkins |
|
Subject: |
Re: Migration to Objective-C 2.0 |
|
Date: |
Mon, 12 Feb 2007 16:21:27 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.3.061214 |
Some of the features seem like they may be genuinely useful in some cases
(properties/fast IV access, garbage collection, fast enumeration, better
protocol definitions) and surely that's a good thing, especially if you
don't HAVE to use them. Does anyone else here have thoughts on this?
On 12/2/07 12:51, in article
mailman.4380.1171284735.2155.discuss-gnustep@gnu.org, "Jeremy Tregunna"
<jtregunna@blurgle.ca> wrote:
>
> In my opinion, it's a lousy attempt to become C# -- read: pandering
> to MS developers, rather than taking care of its base. Bad strategy
> in my opinion.
> On 11-Feb-07, at 5:43 AM, Michael Hopkins wrote:
>
>>
>> Why?
>>
>>> God I surely hope to hell not.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jeremy Tregunna
>>> jtregunna@blurgle.ca
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9-Feb-07, at 7:48 AM, Michael Hopkins wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi all
>>>>
>>>> Does anyone here know whether GNU/gcc/GNUstep are planning to track
>>>> the
>>>> syntax & runtime changes coming in Apple's Objective-C 2.0? If so,
>>>> please
>>>> post info or links.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Michael
>>>>
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
_/ _/ _/_/_/ Hopkins Research Ltd
_/ _/ _/ _/
_/_/_/_/ _/_/_/ http://www.hopkins-research.com/
_/ _/ _/ _/
_/ _/ _/ _/ 'touch the future'
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/