Re: Voting: do you want to move to git?

[Gregory Casamento]

Keeping SVN is a mistake given what has been demonstrated by GNA's
failure.   SVN gives us a single point of failure.   A DVCS would
eliminate that problem.

I agree with flattening the structure.

GC

On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Riccardo Mottola
<riccardo.mottola@libero.it> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 02/13/12 20:45, Amr Aboelela wrote:
>>
>> Why don't we make voting about moving to git?
>>
>> Do you want to move to git?
>>
>> Pls answer yes or no.
>>
>> My answer is: YES
>
> Well, but sharply, my answer is NO.
>
> O prefer a trusted, portable version control and not entangle in some sort
> of featuritis war.
>
> However, we still need a way to solve the current impasse. Personally
> I'dtake the occasion to move back to savannah, which would consolidate our
> "gnu.org" status, keep SVN but flatten out our structure. I never liked us
> being on gna, so even less on github.
> Otherwise an alternative is sourceforge: I have PRICE's CVS there since 9
> years and never had failure, they have real sysadmins I guess...
>
> We need to wait for gna.org to come back up (it still isn't) and also see in
> which state the repository is. Our history is a valuable thing (which we
> should try to keep if we migrate). Lat time savannah of nongnu failed, the
> CVS repo was a mess!
>
> Riccardo
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnustep mailing list
> Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep



-- 
Gregory Casamento
Open Logic Corporation, Principal Consultant
yahoo/skype: greg_casamento, aol: gjcasa
(240)274-9630 (Cell)
http://www.gnustep.org
http://heronsperch.blogspot.com