[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lexical mumblings
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: lexical mumblings |
Date: |
31 Oct 2001 11:56:51 +0900 |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> I think the point of this current exercise though, is that it really
> _isn't_ a `deep change'.
>
> The length of Andrew's message illustrates how big a change this is.
Andrew's approach is excessively complex. It can be done _much_ more simply.
Read my reply to Andrew for some more details, but suffice it to say
that the changes to the C core, for both compiler and intepreter
support, should be extremely simple, almost trivial.
-Miles
--
Yo mama's so fat when she gets on an elevator it HAS to go down.
- Re: lexical mumblings, (continued)
- Re: lexical mumblings, Miles Bader, 2001/10/30
- Re: lexical mumblings, Andrew Innes, 2001/10/30
- Re: lexical mumblings, Miles Bader, 2001/10/30
- Re: lexical mumblings, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/31
- Re: lexical mumblings, Miles Bader, 2001/10/31
- Re: lexical mumblings, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/30
- Re: lexical mumblings,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: lexical mumblings, Andrew Innes, 2001/10/31
- Re: lexical mumblings, Sam Steingold, 2001/10/26
- Re: lexical mumblings, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/29
- Re: lexical mumblings, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/29
- Re: lexical mumblings, Miles Bader, 2001/10/29
- Re: lexical mumblings, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/30
- Re: lexical mumblings, Miles Bader, 2001/10/30
- Re: lexical mumblings, Miles Bader, 2001/10/29
Re: lexical mumblings, Stefan Monnier, 2001/10/21
Re: lexical mumblings, Miles Bader, 2001/10/20