[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: table.el
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: table.el |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Nov 2001 16:03:59 -0700 (MST) |
> This code does not have to be special-purpose and limited to table
> mode. For instance, you could make hook variables for those functions
> to call. Then table.el could set the hook variables to suitable
> functions. This might be useful for some other features as well as
> table.el.
Let me have some time to come up with a proposal for the generic
extension to those functions.
Ok. Please note that it doesn't have to be designed as *one* generic
extension. It could just be a hook or an option in each function.
There is no need to struggle desperately to make this unified, since
it is only meant for wizards to use.
> A few weeks ago, someone proposed on this list a feature for
> discontinuous regions. That was intended, I think, for the sake of
> rectangles, but maybe table.el could use it too. If that works out,
> it could be the cleanest and most general solution.
That would be the ultimate foundation for the table handling. I
consider that feature revolutionary. However, from the experience of
writing this table script I think it won't be as easy as it first
appears. For example, when new characters are inserted in the
rectangle region how should the rectangle grow?
I am not sure. But I think the idea is that the discontinuous region
would be determined when a function wants to use it. So the question
of how to adjust the rectangle might not be any harder than it is now.
- Re: table.el, (continued)
- Re: table.el, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/11/26
- Re: table.el, Miles Bader, 2001/11/26
- Re: table.el, Robert J. Chassell, 2001/11/26
- Re: table.el, Stefan Monnier, 2001/11/26
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/25
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/11/25
- Re: table.el,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: table.el, Alex Schroeder, 2001/11/24
table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/11/28