[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GTK patches part 1
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: GTK patches part 1 |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Dec 2002 10:24:21 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 09:42:43AM -0500, Alan Shutko wrote:
> Maybe --with-gtk should continue to specify where to find gtk, and
> --with-x-toolkit=gtk can turn on gtk? But it seems annoying to have
> to specify --with-x-toolkit=gtk if you're already specifying a gtk
> path.
I think that:
* --with-gtk=<anything> should turn on GTK, even if --with-x-toolkit=gtk is
not specified, and that specifying --with-gtk simultaneously with
--with-x-toolkit=<anything-but-gtk> should be an error.
* --with-x-toolkit=gtk should _also_ turn on GTK, even if --with-gtk is not
specified.
That way users can use whichever method they find most natural.
-Miles
--
P.S. All information contained in the above letter is false,
for reasons of military security.
- GTK patches part 1, Jan D., 2002/12/08
- Re: GTK patches part 1, Miles Bader, 2002/12/09
- Re: GTK patches part 1, Jan D., 2002/12/09
- Re: GTK patches part 1, Miles Bader, 2002/12/09
- Re: GTK patches part 1, Alan Shutko, 2002/12/09
- Re: GTK patches part 1, Jan D., 2002/12/09
- Re: GTK patches part 1,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: GTK patches part 1, Richard Stallman, 2002/12/10
- Re: GTK patches part 1, Jan D., 2002/12/09