[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug in forward-visible-line: Patch
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: bug in forward-visible-line: Patch |
Date: |
Fri, 23 May 2003 10:50:33 -0500 (CDT) |
David Kastrup wrote:
If (listp prop) evaluates to t, nil is always returned.
Yes, this was a typo which I fixed in a later posting. It should have
said: (dolist (var prop t)
Also, the use of get-text-property was a bug. I should have used
get-char-property or overlays would not be handled correctly.
All of these are moot points now, since my main oversight at the time
was not to notice that there already was a function with a similar
functionality: line-move-invisible. (I noticed it later.)
That function has problems that should be corrected as I pointed out,
but I believe that doing so would eliminate the need for a new
function.
Sincerely,
Luc.
- Re: bug in forward-visible-line: Patch, (continued)
- Re: bug in forward-visible-line: Patch, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/05/22
- Re: bug in forward-visible-line: Patch, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/05/22
- Re: bug in forward-visible-line: Patch, David Kastrup, 2003/05/23
- Re: bug in forward-visible-line: Patch, Miles Bader, 2003/05/23
- Re: bug in forward-visible-line: Patch, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/05/23
- Re: bug in forward-visible-line: Patch, Richard Stallman, 2003/05/24
- Re: bug in forward-visible-line: Patch, Richard Stallman, 2003/05/23
- Re: bug in forward-visible-line: Patch,
Luc Teirlinck <=
Re: bug in forward-visible-line: Patch, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/05/22