[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: desktop
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: desktop |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Aug 2003 23:59:56 -0400 |
> @example
> (desktop-load-default)
> (desktop-read)
> (setq desktop-enable t)
> @end example
>
>Are you saying that the second option is a mistake?
>
>
Yes. The desktop module adds an anonymous function to the
after-init-hook, this function calls desktop-read.
What should that text say?
desktop-remove is, according to the docstring, supposed to "Delete the
Desktop file and inactivate the desktop system". If we introduce
desktop-save as a minor mode, disabling is should be done by the mode
function. Furthermore desktop-remove only removes the desktop file in
desktop-dirname, not desktop files in other directories. I think it
would be better not to delete any desktop file at all.
Let's keep desktop-remove for compatibility.
- Re: desktop, (continued)
- Re: desktop, Richard Stallman, 2003/08/18
- Re: desktop, Lars Hansen, 2003/08/18
- Re: desktop, Miles Bader, 2003/08/18
- Re: desktop, Alex Schroeder, 2003/08/18
- Re: desktop, Miles Bader, 2003/08/19
- Re: desktop, Lars Hansen, 2003/08/19
- Re: desktop, Richard Stallman, 2003/08/20
- Message not available
- Re: desktop, Richard Stallman, 2003/08/21
- Re: desktop, Lars Hansen, 2003/08/22
- Re: desktop, Alex Schroeder, 2003/08/22
- Re: desktop,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: desktop, Lars Hansen, 2003/08/24
- Re: desktop, Richard Stallman, 2003/08/23
- Re: desktop, Lars Hansen, 2003/08/24
- Re: desktop, Alex Schroeder, 2003/08/24
- Re: desktop, Lars Hansen, 2003/08/25
- Re: desktop, Richard Stallman, 2003/08/25
- Re: desktop, Richard Stallman, 2003/08/24
- Re: desktop, Lars Hansen, 2003/08/25
- Message not available
- Re: desktop, Alex Schroeder, 2003/08/22
- Re: desktop, Alex Schroeder, 2003/08/18