[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: new *Help* argument highlighting
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: new *Help* argument highlighting |
Date: |
Sun, 09 May 2004 02:09:24 +0200 |
On Sat, 8 May 2004 19:49:56 -0400, Miles Bader <address@hidden> wrote:
> I think that if the highlighted args are too noticeable, we should reduce
> their highlighting, not start highlighting everything else.
Yes.
Personally I find arg highlighting very useful (it helps me a lot to
quickly extract information from help buffers, in particular from
long-winded docstrings) but I think the key is that args are somewhat
more visible, not the absolute focus of attention. That would be
distracting.
> Personally I wish we had even more subtle
> methods of highlighting (e.g., an underline with very sparsely-spaced dots
> instead of a solid line).
That could perhaps be done with stipples, but seems a bit over the top.
Another alternative is to use a soft shade of gray, for example this:
(defface myhelp-argument-name '(((background light) :foreground "gray45")
((background dark) :foreground "gray70"))
"Face to highlight argument names in *Help* buffers")
/L/e/k/t/u
- new *Help* argument highlighting, Miles Bader, 2004/05/07
- Re: new *Help* argument highlighting, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/09
- Re: new *Help* argument highlighting, Miles Bader, 2004/05/09
- Re: new *Help* argument highlighting, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/05/09
- Re: new *Help* argument highlighting, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/09
- Re: new *Help* argument highlighting, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/05/09
- Re: new *Help* argument highlighting, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/09
- Re: new *Help* argument highlighting, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/05/09
- Re: new *Help* argument highlighting, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/09
- Re: new *Help* argument highlighting, Juanma Barranquero, 2004/05/09
- Re: new *Help* argument highlighting, Miles Bader, 2004/05/09