[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: next-error refactoring
From: |
Juri Linkov |
Subject: |
Re: next-error refactoring |
Date: |
Fri, 28 May 2004 21:14:42 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden> writes:
> Is it time to make next-error a minor mode with its own next-error.el
> file? It seems like a useful thing, instead of manually hooking it
> into all the user modes. The minor mode could provide hooks that
> would replace the current code; this would also facilitate adoption
> by other modes.
Yes, making it a minor mode with its own file would be a very useful thing!
However, I think the name `next-error' is not right anymore when
applied to non-`compile' modes like `grep', `diff', `occur', and
possible future modes.
Its name should clearly constitute its essence which is to visit the
locations described in one buffer sequentially or in a user-defined
order in other buffers.
--
Juri Linkov
http://www.jurta.org/emacs/
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, (continued)
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/06
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/06
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/08
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/09
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Kim F. Storm, 2004/05/09
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/05/10
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Stefan Daschek, 2004/05/10
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/28
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Kim F. Storm, 2004/05/28
- next-error refactoring (was: compilation-highlight-duration), Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/28
- Re: next-error refactoring,
Juri Linkov <=
- Re: next-error refactoring, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/29
- Re: next-error refactoring (was: compilation-highlight-duration), Richard Stallman, 2004/05/29
- Re: compilation-highlight-duration, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/29