Re: compilation-highlight-duration

[Kim F. Storm]

Juri Linkov <address@hidden> writes:

> Adding `next-error-highlight' and `next-error-highlight-no-select'
> reveals one problem.  When these user options are defined by
> `defcustom' it requires to specify a group name under which they
> should be placed.  The current logic by using the `next-error-' prefix
> suggests the group name `next-error'.  But it would be misleading for modes
> other than compile.  For grep, diff and occur this name makes no sense.
> 
> There are aliases `goto-next-locus' and `next-match' for `next-error'
> which suggest a better name.  Perhaps something like `follow-locus'
> would be better?

I would NEVER think of that name as having anything to do with this...

What about the group named "matching" (occur already uses that).


-- 
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk