Re: address@hidden: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.]

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: address@hidden (Kim F. Storm)
> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:36:33 +0200
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden,
>       address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> 
> CVS emacs currently has emacs-version 21.3.50.12 or similar, so
> what need changing?

I might be missing something, but don't we assume somewhere that
X.Y.Z.NN version signals a pretest, while X.Y.NN signals a released
version?

Anyway, what's wrong with the current scheme that we need to abandon
it, and how does the suggested 3-component scheme improves that to a
degree that justifies additional work (to fix all those places that
will need fixing)?