Re: require inside functions.

[Miles Bader]

On Apr 8, 2005 9:45 AM, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
> > I don't understand it either, but ... if require doesn't actually load
> > the file, surely nothing at all should be added to `current-load-list'?
> 
> current-load-list is used to build load-history and it was recently
> discovered that the (require . foo) entries should be added there, whether
> the require did cause a load or not.

Can you give a pointer to the discussion where it was discovered?  I
find it quite counter-intuitive (my intuition says "require should be
a nop for an already-loaded feature").

-Miles
-- 
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.