Re: define-derived-mode

[Lute Kamstra]

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

>     If I understood correctly, define-generic-mode only started
>     constructing automatic defcustoms recently, which was an incompatible
>     change.   In that case, it could easily be reversed, which would make
>     the two major mode defining functions consistent in this respect.
>
>     For define-minor-mode, the situation is more complex.  It already
>     defined defcustoms in 21.3.  So here, removing them would be an
>     incompatible change.  It is possible that some users already
>     customized these hooks through Custom.
>
> Such a change is no big deal.  Let's turn off generation of these
> defcustoms.

I just did this for define-generic-mode.  I'll do define-minor-mode as
well.

Lute.