[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: File menu changes (suggestions)
From: |
John S. Yates, Jr. |
Subject: |
Re: File menu changes (suggestions) |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Jun 2005 08:32:14 -0400 |
It seems quite clear to me that given the semantics
of Emacs' file-open there can never be a happy choice
between New and Open. This is because in the CUA
world these operations have clear implications about
the existence or non-existence of the argument object.
New and Open have readily understood and internalize
failure semantics. Users do not view such failures
as inefficiencies or a lack of DWIM in the interface.
They experience it instead as a confidence building
feature: either their expressed intent is successfully
carried out or they receive an indication of a failure.
OTOH Emacs' file-open offers no way to express such
detailed intent. Instead it smears the distinction
that separate New and Open present.
One solution might be to add an optional tri-valued
argument to find-file: CLASSIC, NEW, EXISTING.
/john
- RE: File menu changes (suggestions) / Options menu, David Reitter, 2005/06/21
- Re: File menu changes (suggestions),
John S. Yates, Jr. <=
- Re: File menu changes (suggestions), Miles Bader, 2005/06/22
- Re: File menu changes (suggestions), John S. Yates, Jr., 2005/06/22
- Re: File menu changes (suggestions), Miles Bader, 2005/06/22
- Re: File menu changes (suggestions), John S. Yates, Jr., 2005/06/23
- Re: File menu changes (suggestions), Miles Bader, 2005/06/23
- Re: File menu changes (suggestions), Richard M. Stallman, 2005/06/24
- Re: File menu changes (suggestions), John S. Yates, Jr., 2005/06/24
- Re: File menu changes (suggestions), Richard M. Stallman, 2005/06/25
- Re: File menu changes (suggestions), Eli Zaretskii, 2005/06/24