Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?

[Miles Bader]

"Herbert Euler" <address@hidden> writes:
>>     But if so I think the name 'max-specpdl-size' should be altered, since
>>     normally a maximum value needs explicitly change, i.e. there should be
>>     a particular function to change a maximum value.
>>
>>What would you think of specpdl-size-limit as a name for this?
>
> Yes it's better, since this name (in my opinion) is not confused.

They sound exactly the same to me...

-Miles
-- 
A zen-buddhist walked into a pizza shop and
said, "Make me one with everything."