emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PURESIZE increased (again)


From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: PURESIZE increased (again)
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 19:19:59 +0300

> From: Reiner Steib <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 15:11:52 +0200
> 
> Okay, the following results are with an unmodified, clean source
> tree[1] with configure ...  && make bootstrap.  I've put the complete
> logs for each arch (i686 and x86_64) on the web [2] in the files
> emacs-build-`date -I`-`uname -m`.log.gz (*.gz; 39K / 54K).
> 
> During "make bootstrap", I get:
> 
> ,----[ x86_64 ]
> | Finding pointers to doc strings...done
> | Dumping under names emacs and emacs-22.0.50
> | 108788 pure bytes used
> | mv -f emacs bootstrap-emacs
> | [...]
> | Finding pointers to doc strings...done
> | Dumping under names emacs and emacs-22.0.50.1
> | emacs:0:Pure Lisp storage overflow (approx. 2159640 bytes needed)
> | 1536 pure bytes used
> | ./emacs -q -batch -f list-load-path-shadows
> `----

Thanks.  So the mystery is still here, since this is the same value
you reported before.

I think it's time to see whether the *.elc files we use are identical.
Can you upload a couple of worst offenders, say, files.elc and
simple.elc?  I'd like to compare them to mine.

TIA




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]