Re: Emacs and GFortran

[Steve Kargl]

On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 09:40:39PM -0500, Chong Yidong wrote:
> > With the "simple" patch
> >
> >                 === gfortran Summary ===
> >
> > # of expected passes            12734
> > # of unexpected failures        2171
> > # of expected failures          7
> > # of unsupported tests          73
> 
> If your test suites rely on a non-standard error-reporting format,
> bringing the format into standards-compliance will obviously break the
> test suites; but the bug here doesn't lie in the standards-compliance.

The two posted patches do not bring gfortran into conformance with
the GNU error format.  It breaks the testsuite, which might be 
important to ensure half-baked patches aren't wedged into gfortran.

-- 
Steve