[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Multi-tty vs. non-Un*x ports (Re: copyrights to be fixed)
From: |
rentey <address@hidden> |
Subject: |
Multi-tty vs. non-Un*x ports (Re: copyrights to be fixed) |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Feb 2007 19:29:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0b2 (Windows/20070116) |
Richard Stallman wrote:
> AFAIK the main missing thing is that the Windows and Mac ports
> probably don't even compile, they have not been kept up to date with
> the rest of the changes. It shouldn't be too hard for someone that
> knows those platforms to fix this.
>
> This is the sort of issue I was hoping to find out about. There may
> be other such gaps in places that the current users won't run across.
> To install the multi-tty feature, we need to fill in the gaps.
>
> Can someone please enter this in a special TODO in the multi-tty branch?
The porting issue is already explained in its TODO list.
--
Károly
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: multi-tty branch + GTK (Re: copyrights to be fixed), (continued)
- Re: copyrights to be fixed, Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/11
- Re: copyrights to be fixed, Mark Plaksin, 2007/02/10
- Re: copyrights to be fixed, Manoj Srivastava, 2007/02/11
- Re: copyrights to be fixed, Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/02/11
- Re: copyrights to be fixed, David Kastrup, 2007/02/11
- Multi-tty merge plan (Re: copyrights to be fixed), Károly Lőrentey, 2007/02/13
- Re: copyrights to be fixed, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/11
- Multi-tty vs. non-Un*x ports (Re: copyrights to be fixed),
rentey <address@hidden> <=
- Re: Multi-tty vs. non-Un*x ports (Re: copyrights to be fixed), Richard Stallman, 2007/02/14
- Re: copyrights to be fixed, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/02/09