Re: Multi-tty design (Re: Reordering etc/NEWS)

[Jason Rumney]

Dan Nicolaescu wrote:
> Yes, intentionally as it is irrelevant here. Before your change people
> were able to test the multi-tty functionality, after it they are not. 
> Nobody claimed the code was bug free, but it did do what was
> advertised to do.
>
> This shows a total lack of respect for all the hard work Karoly's put
> in for a few years.
>   

Helping to fix bugs does not show a lack of respect.

One has to expect some short term disruption when using code from CVS. 
Perhaps you have forgotten that over the last 3 years, as Emacs has been 
perilously close to release for that time, and thus reasonably stable.