Re: pretest 22.0.100

[David Kastrup]

Jason Rumney <address@hidden> writes:

> Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> Yes, the same mistake was made then (but was not made for Emacs-20.1).
>> It's no excuse to repeat it.
>>   
>
> If it was deliberate, then it was not a mistake. And history shows
> that Emacs has always had version numbers, not version strings.

Does not change that people looking for a tarball to download will
take a look at the bottom for the most recent one.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum