[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: byte compiler warnings when bootstrapping
From: |
Dan Nicolaescu |
Subject: |
Re: byte compiler warnings when bootstrapping |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Oct 2007 09:33:58 -0700 |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> > > > With that and with adding a few more (eval-when-compile (require
'blah))
> > >
> > > What is the use of (eval-when-compile (require 'blah)) in this
context?
> > > I expect it's the wrong solution.
> >
> > When the number of warnings for undefined functions is too high it
> > might be better to just require the package that defines them. But you
> > might be right...
>
> But how do the functions actually get defined at runtime?
Autoloading
(defun foo ()
(info)
(Info-read-node-name) <- this gets a byte compiler a warning,
but it is defined at runtime.
- byte compiler warnings when bootstrapping, Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/10/21
- Re: byte compiler warnings when bootstrapping, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/21
- Re: byte compiler warnings when bootstrapping, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/21
- Re: byte compiler warnings when bootstrapping, Bob Rogers, 2007/10/21
- Re: byte compiler warnings when bootstrapping, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/23
- Re: byte compiler warnings when bootstrapping, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/23
- Re: byte compiler warnings when bootstrapping, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/23
- Re: byte compiler warnings when bootstrapping, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/23
- Re: byte compiler warnings when bootstrapping, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/23
- Re: byte compiler warnings when bootstrapping, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/24
- Re: byte compiler warnings when bootstrapping, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/23