[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: region-active-p
From: |
Andreas Röhler |
Subject: |
Re: region-active-p |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Oct 2007 09:57:41 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.5 |
Am Samstag, 27. Oktober 2007 08:17 schrieb Miles Bader:
> "Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden> writes:
> > `region-active-p' does not check that the region has non-zero length.
> >
> > My point is that whether it makes sense to operate on a region of
> > length zero depends on the operation, so `region-active-p' doesn't try
> > to decide.
>
> So, which operations _don't_ check? Well, I assume there are some which
> don't check, but probably should, so maybe it's more reasonable to ask,
> which operations _shouldn't_ check?
>
> -Miles
After all, checking in Juri's proposal would ease
writing GNU code and enhance compatibility. May he get
a green light?
Andreas Röhler
- Re: region-active-p, (continued)
- Re: region-active-p, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/10/24
- Re: region-active-p, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/25
- Re: region-active-p, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/10/26
- Re: region-active-p, Andreas Röhler, 2007/10/26
- Re: region-active-p, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/10/26
- Re: region-active-p, Andreas Röhler, 2007/10/26
- Re: region-active-p, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/10/26
- Re: region-active-p, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/26
- Re: region-active-p, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/10/27
- Re: region-active-p, Miles Bader, 2007/10/27
- Re: region-active-p,
Andreas Röhler <=
- Re: region-active-p, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/10/28
- Re: region-active-p, Miles Bader, 2007/10/28
- Re: region-active-p, Johan Bockgård, 2007/10/28
- Re: region-active-p, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/28
- Re: region-active-p, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/28
- Re: region-active-p, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/27
- Re: region-active-p, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/27
- Re: region-active-p, Miles Bader, 2007/10/27
- Re: region-active-p, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/27
- Re: region-active-p, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/28