Re: Emacs.app (Cocoa/GNUstep port) release and feature list

[Adrian Robert]

On 11/23/07, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
> > This port maintained its own CVS for a while, but that was messing up
> > existing tags in emacs files and also making syncing with emacs CVS
> > difficult.  I know there are git and arch alternatives here, but
> > Richard has said he is OK with bringing this into the trunk after the
> > unicode merge and that seems like the best route for maintenance.  (A
> > branch is another possibility but that still leaves an ongoing merge
> > burden.)
>
> I think it would be good to add it as a branch in the CVS.  It won't add
> any "merge burden" that isn't already present.  And it will make it easier
> to keep them synchronized, to compare them, etc...

If this is the preferred route I'll consider it, but on the whole I'd
rather just wait and merge to trunk, unless that is far off or might
not happen.  I've been posting diffs on sourceforge for comparison
purposes.  What was the merge process for the Carbon port?