[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Improving X selection?
From: |
David De La Harpe Golden |
Subject: |
Re: Improving X selection? |
Date: |
Fri, 1 Feb 2008 19:15:50 +0000 |
Attached patch introduces an interprogram-highlight-function and
extends values of x-select-enable-clipboard / x-select-enable-primary
in an (I think) useful manner*. The descriptions of the
customizations may be overly verbose.
Another mail to follow about making select-active-regions work.
[This is all still separate to but not incompatible with the idea of
having interprogram-paste-function be capable of returning more than
one value.]
* Note that since switching to trunk following unicode2 merge,
w32-vars.el is now being loaded on my linux system, not clear on why
(multi-tty?) - and it also contained an alternate
x-select-enable-clipboard definition , which strikes me as even
stranger, but I don't know about w32 (don't even have microsoft
windows) - the patch just comments it out, not clear on what the right
thing to do is, or why w32 is having anything to do with x x-select-*
in the first place (surely it has its own w32-select-* for its
interprogram-cut/paste functions?)
enhanced-x-selections.diff
Description: Text Data
- Re: Improving X selection?,
David De La Harpe Golden <=
- Re: Improving X selection?, David De La Harpe Golden, 2008/02/01
- Re: Improving X selection?, David De La Harpe Golden, 2008/02/03
- Re: Improving X selection?, Jan D., 2008/02/03
- Re: Improving X selection?, David De La Harpe Golden, 2008/02/03
- Re: Improving X selection?, David De La Harpe Golden, 2008/02/04
- Re: Improving X selection?, David De La Harpe Golden, 2008/02/04
- Re: Improving X selection?, Jan Djärv, 2008/02/05
- Re: Improving X selection?, David De La Harpe Golden, 2008/02/06
- Re: Improving X selection?, Miles Bader, 2008/02/06
- Re: Improving X selection?, David De La Harpe Golden, 2008/02/06