[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: python.el fixes for Emacs 22
From: |
Nick Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: python.el fixes for Emacs 22 |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Feb 2008 12:57:17 +1300 |
> > I never installed that patch because I was uncertain about the authorship
> > of the parts of python-mode.el that I was taking from.
>
>
> i believe that any changes to the code for pdb tracking functionality were
> trivial, and that my copyright assignment would be sufficient for that part
> of it. i can check with barry, who incorporated the stand-alone code i had
> written (as "pdbtrack.el") into python-mode.el
About 90% of the patch is for pdbtrack, mostly taken verbatim after the line:
;; pdbtrack features
The other 10% is generally defining defcustoms that pdbtrack uses.
>...
> > I still have a local copy of the patch updated to the trunk and could
> > install
> > it now if instructed to do so.
> >
> > There appear to be two options:
> >
> > 1) Install my patch in python.el which may in reality only involve your
> > contribution to python-mode.el and may not require other signatures.
> >
> > 2) Replace python.el with a modified python-mode.el which would require
> > more signatures (Barry Warsaw, Skip Montanero?) and more work.
>
>
> it sounds like you have done some substantial comparison between the two
> implementations of python-mode, at least when you were working on the
> patches. can you characterize the differences between the two? i never
> tried python.el very far, because it lacked pdb tracking - but i've always
> been favorably impressed with python-mode.el, and would be expect it to
> offer a good basis to work from.
Firstly, as a disclaimer, I'm not a Python programmer. My curiosity came from
working on gud.el and M-x pdb. So I can't characterise the differences between
the two but I'm sure someone else on the list can.
> i'm planning to contact barry and skip to see about copyright assignments -
> would that help? would you be willing to revisit your patches and bring
> them up to date, if clearance for python-mode.el became possible?
I think they are up to date. I've just tried to take pdbtrack from
python-mode.el and adapt it for python.el. I can't remember the details
but I think I made minor changes like making the hooks added to
comint-output-filter-functions local.
My intention was just to get pdbtrack into python.el and leave it to those
who use Python to make improvements.
--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob
- Re: python.el fixes for Emacs 22, (continued)
- Re: python.el fixes for Emacs 22, Richard Stallman, 2008/02/17
- Re: python.el fixes for Emacs 22, Piet van Oostrum, 2008/02/17
- Re: python.el fixes for Emacs 22, Richard Stallman, 2008/02/15
- Re: python.el fixes for Emacs 22, David Kastrup, 2008/02/15
- Re: python.el fixes for Emacs 22, Ken Manheimer, 2008/02/15
- Re: python.el fixes for Emacs 22, Nick Roberts, 2008/02/15
- Re: python.el fixes for Emacs 22, Ken Manheimer, 2008/02/15
- Re: python.el fixes for Emacs 22,
Nick Roberts <=
- Re: python.el fixes for Emacs 22, Ken Manheimer, 2008/02/15
- python.el versus python-mode.el [was Re: python.el fixes for Emacs 22], Glenn Morris, 2008/02/15
- Re: python.el fixes for Emacs 22, Richard Stallman, 2008/02/17
- Re: python.el fixes for Emacs 22, Richard Stallman, 2008/02/17
- Re: python.el fixes for Emacs 22, Nick Roberts, 2008/02/19
- pdbtrack [was Re: python.el fixes for Emacs 22], Glenn Morris, 2008/02/19
- Re: pdbtrack [was Re: python.el fixes for Emacs 22], Nick Roberts, 2008/02/19
- Re: pdbtrack, Glenn Morris, 2008/02/19
- Re: pdbtrack [was Re: python.el fixes for Emacs 22], Ken Manheimer, 2008/02/21
- Re: pdbtrack, Glenn Morris, 2008/02/21