Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap

[Rajesh Vaidheeswarran]

Miles Bader wrote:
> > > and had lots of unneeded features and features which didn't follow Emacs
> > > conventions.  It doesn't seem necessary to me to _exactly_ preserve the
> > >       
> > No one stopped you from either filing bugs against it, or better still
> > "fixing" it. That's pretty much all I have to state on this thread.
> >     
>
> And indeed, that's what's being done now.
>   

That's unfortunately not the case. The original library was moved to 
old-whitespace and a new library was put in place.. Fixing, to me, would 
mean that the fixes go into what was considered broken.