[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap |
|
Date: |
Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:15:29 -0500 |
I gather that Richard wanted the new functionality to use the
"whitespace" name, which makes some sense, but it seems seems to have
been done rather clumsily in some cases. E.g. the new
"whitespace-buffer" command seems completely different than the old
"whitespace-buffer" command, and really there seems no good reason for
it.
Vinicius, can you fix up these wrinkles?
- 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Michael Welsh Duggan, 2008/02/05
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Rajesh Vaidheeswarran, 2008/02/05
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Michael Welsh Duggan, 2008/02/06
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Rajesh Vaidheeswarran, 2008/02/06
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Glenn Morris, 2008/02/07
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Miles Bader, 2008/02/07
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Rajesh Vaidheeswarran, 2008/02/07
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Vinicius Jose Latorre, 2008/02/08
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Vinicius Jose Latorre, 2008/02/15
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Miles Bader, 2008/02/15
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Vinicius Jose Latorre, 2008/02/16
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Richard Stallman, 2008/02/17
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Rajesh Vaidheeswarran, 2008/02/19
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Miles Bader, 2008/02/19
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Rajesh Vaidheeswarran, 2008/02/19
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Richard Stallman, 2008/02/17
- Re: 23.0.60; whitespace.el mishap, Vinicius Jose Latorre, 2008/02/17