[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Problem with narrow vs condensed fonts
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: Problem with narrow vs condensed fonts |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:23:41 +0900 |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/23.0.60 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
In article <address@hidden>, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>>> Does this make sense? Should we fix font-swidth-table and friends (and
>>> change internal-set-font-style-table to check that the tables are indeed
>>> bijective)?
> > That completely breaks font section.
> Sounds great ;-)
> What is "font section"?
I found that this change:
2008-02-22 Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
* faces.el (font-weight-table, font-slant-table, font-swidth-table):
Make those tables bijective.
interacts badly with this change:
2008-02-01 Jason Rumney <address@hidden>
* font.c (font_parse_fcname): Default weight and slant to normal.
Jason, could you explain why we should set the default
values for weight and slant in font_parse_fcname?
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- Problem with narrow vs condensed fonts, Stefan Monnier, 2008/02/18
- Re: Problem with narrow vs condensed fonts, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/02/18
- Re: Problem with narrow vs condensed fonts, Andreas Schwab, 2008/02/24
- Re: Problem with narrow vs condensed fonts, Andreas Schwab, 2008/02/25
- Re: Problem with narrow vs condensed fonts, Stefan Monnier, 2008/02/25
- Re: Problem with narrow vs condensed fonts, Kenichi Handa, 2008/02/25
- Re: Problem with narrow vs condensed fonts, Stefan Monnier, 2008/02/25
- Re: Problem with narrow vs condensed fonts, Kenichi Handa, 2008/02/25
- Re: Problem with narrow vs condensed fonts, Stefan Monnier, 2008/02/25
- Re: Problem with narrow vs condensed fonts, Stefan Monnier, 2008/02/25