[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8 |
Date: |
Mon, 19 May 2008 21:56:02 +0300 |
> From: Patrick Drechsler <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 16:32:10 +0200
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> > I believe that there is a utf-8-signature or similarly named coding
> > system which does this. (It's called utf-8-bom in XEmacs but IIRC
> > Emacs uses the more accurate name, since UTF-8 is of course always
> > bigendian.)
>
> Thanks for the feedback Stephen.
>
> I am not able to find this coding system by searching through the list
> of possible coding systems (describe-coding-system -> TAB).
That's because Emacs doesn't have it.
- Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, (continued)
23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/05/17
- Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Miles Bader, 2008/05/17
- Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/05/17
- Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/05/18
- Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Jason Rumney, 2008/05/18
- Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Patrick Drechsler, 2008/05/18
- Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/05/18
- Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Patrick Drechsler, 2008/05/19
- Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Patrick Drechsler, 2008/05/20
Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, joakim, 2008/05/18
Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/05/18
Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Miles Bader, 2008/05/18
Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, David Kastrup, 2008/05/18
Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/05/18
Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, David Kastrup, 2008/05/19
Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/05/19
Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, David Kastrup, 2008/05/19
Re: 23.0.60; [nxml] BOM and utf-8, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/05/19