[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Jun 2008 22:23:16 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
> I am trying to switch from pcl-cvs to vc-status to use the same
> interface for cvs and hg.
> I have the following problems though:
> 1. commit is in foreground, not background.
Yes, patches welcome.
> 2. there is no way to update the whole directory (O in pcl-cvs runs
> cvs-mode-update which runs "cvs up" on the selection or the whole
> directory).
Indeed, patches welcome.
> 3. lines like "DIRECTORY ./" - what are they for? how do I
> get rid of them?
They're there so you can select the whole directory. PCL-CVS has them
as well (tho they were configurable so you may have disabled them).
vc-dir (previous "vc-status") is very much a work in progress, as you've seen.
Stefan
- vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Sam Steingold, 2008/06/03
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Nick Roberts, 2008/06/03
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/03
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Nick Roberts, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/06/04
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Nick Roberts, 2008/06/05
- Re: vc-status vs pcl-cvs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/05