[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Display-based word wrapping
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Display-based word wrapping |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:46:48 +0900 |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>> There's also the matter of what to do with `toggle-truncate-lines'.
>
> This has 2 issues: the name of the command, and its functionality.
> I think we'll find that once we figured what is the right fix for its
> functionality, the naming issue will be easy to solve.
Tho the concept of truncation still seems quite valid
--
(\(\
(^.^)
(")")
*This is the cute bunny virus, please copy this into your sig so it can spread.
- Re: Display-based word wrapping, (continued)
Display-based word wrapping, Chong Yidong, 2008/06/24
- Re: Display-based word wrapping, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/24
- Re: Display-based word wrapping, Chong Yidong, 2008/06/24
- Re: Display-based word wrapping, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/24
- Re: Display-based word wrapping, Chong Yidong, 2008/06/24
- Re: Display-based word wrapping, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/24
- Re: Display-based word wrapping,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: Display-based word wrapping, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/24
- Re: Display-based word wrapping, Chong Yidong, 2008/06/24
- Re: Display-based word wrapping, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/24
- Re: Display-based word wrapping, Chong Yidong, 2008/06/25
- Re: Display-based word wrapping, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/25