[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tags for functions
From: |
MON KEY |
Subject: |
Re: tags for functions |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:07:23 -0500 |
>2) refine the keywords into a simple taxonomy that is not too big nor too
>small.
> The first question I have is, how to associate keywords with a function?
Keep in mind that a taxonomic description of code's content/concepts
is entirely different from a coded object class hierarchy - the
distinction is subtle and all to often overlooked... esp. by
programmers who *are* in fact quite adept at creating taxonomy in
code.
Please consider examining the following standard for a comprehensive
approach to accomplishing this task with optimal consideration of TRT.
ANSI/NISO Z39.19-2005
Guidelines for the Construction, Format, and Management of Monolingual
Controlled Vocabularies
ISBN: 1-880124-65-3
Available here: http://www.niso.org/standards/resources/Z39-19-2005.pdf
- Re: tags for functions, (continued)
- Re: tags for functions, Ted Zlatanov, 2009/01/29
- Re: tags for functions, Stefan Monnier, 2009/01/29
- Re: tags for functions, Ted Zlatanov, 2009/01/30
- RE: tags for functions, Drew Adams, 2009/01/30
- Re: tags for functions, Ted Zlatanov, 2009/01/30
- Re: tags for functions, Juri Linkov, 2009/01/31
- Re: tags for functions, Stefan Monnier, 2009/01/30
- RE: tags for functions, Drew Adams, 2009/01/30
- Re: tags for functions, Lennart Borgman, 2009/01/29
- Re: tags for functions, Ted Zlatanov, 2009/01/30
Re: tags for functions,
MON KEY <=
Re: tags for functions, S+*n_Pe*rm*n, 2009/01/22
Re: tags for functions, S+*n_Pe*rm*n, 2009/01/23