[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: tags for functions
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: tags for functions |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:06:42 -0800 |
1. When the thing documented in *Help* is also in the manual, then we have a
link to the manual from the *Help* buffer.
2. The manual should have such a `See also' cross reference, if any place
should.
3. When both the thing doc'd in *Help* and the thing xref'd are in the manual,
#1 and #2 would take care of such cross-referencing. Admittedly, passing through
the manual represents an indirection, but typically a fruitful one.
Dunno if it's worth adding this for cases that are not covered by the manual. It
sounds like a helpful feature. I can't speak to the implementation cost. (There
is also a doc-maintenance cost to consider.)
- Re: tags for functions, (continued)
- Re: tags for functions, Ted Zlatanov, 2009/01/27
- Re: tags for functions, Juri Linkov, 2009/01/27
- Re: tags for functions, Lennart Borgman, 2009/01/27
- Re: tags for functions, Ted Zlatanov, 2009/01/28
- Re: tags for functions, Stefan Monnier, 2009/01/28
- Re: tags for functions, Ted Zlatanov, 2009/01/28
- Re: tags for functions, Stefan Monnier, 2009/01/28
- Re: tags for functions, Ted Zlatanov, 2009/01/29
- Re: tags for functions, Stefan Monnier, 2009/01/29
- Re: tags for functions, Ted Zlatanov, 2009/01/30
- RE: tags for functions,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: tags for functions, Ted Zlatanov, 2009/01/30
- Re: tags for functions, Juri Linkov, 2009/01/31
- Re: tags for functions, Stefan Monnier, 2009/01/30
- RE: tags for functions, Drew Adams, 2009/01/30
- Re: tags for functions, Lennart Borgman, 2009/01/29
- Re: tags for functions, Ted Zlatanov, 2009/01/30
Re: tags for functions, MON KEY, 2009/01/22
Re: tags for functions, S+*n_Pe*rm*n, 2009/01/22