[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-j considered harmful (not really)
From: |
Xavier Maillard |
Subject: |
Re: C-j considered harmful (not really) |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:17:35 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Rmail GNU emacs 23.1 on cat: /etc/slackware-version: No such file or directory |
>> That key should be used in I-search with the same meaning as C-j has
>> now, and should
>> be possible to use instead of C-q C-j to enter a newline in minibuffer
>> input. Maybe
>> <C-return> could be used for this?
>
> How about M-RET instead? That works in non-windowed Emacs as well and
> seems to be unbound by default.
In IM clients, S-RET inserts newline, and RET accepts input.
Does it work in -nw environment ? Here S-RET is not recognized in
my session (GNU Emacs running in the linux console).
Xavier
--
http://www.gnu.org
http://www.april.org
http://www.lolica.org
- C-j considered harmful (not really), Per Starbäck, 2009/11/16
- Re: C-j considered harmful (not really), Deniz Dogan, 2009/11/16
- Re: C-j considered harmful (not really), Juri Linkov, 2009/11/17
- Re: C-j considered harmful (not really), Per Starbäck, 2009/11/22
- Re: C-j considered harmful (not really), Deniz Dogan, 2009/11/22
- Re: C-j considered harmful (not really), Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/22
- Re: C-j considered harmful (not really), Juri Linkov, 2009/11/23
- Re: C-j considered harmful (not really), Per Starbäck, 2009/11/23
- RE: C-j considered harmful (not really), Drew Adams, 2009/11/23
- RE: C-j considered harmful (not really), Drew Adams, 2009/11/23
- Re: C-j considered harmful (not really), Per Starbäck, 2009/11/23
- Re: C-j considered harmful (not really), Juri Linkov, 2009/11/24