[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs
From: |
Lennart Borgman |
Subject: |
Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:12:20 +0100 |
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 9:37 PM, Richard Stallman <address@hidden> wrote:
> This work is licensed to you under version 2 of the GNU General Public
> License. Alternatively, you may choose to receive this work under any
> other license that grants the right to use, copy, modify, and/or
> distribute the work, as long as that license imposes the restriction
> that derivative works have to grant the same rights and impose the
> same restriction. For example, you may choose to receive this work
> under the GNU Free Documentation License, the CreativeCommons
> ShareAlike License, the XEmacs manual license, or similar licenses."
>
> So that allows the GPLv3, as well as many other licenses.
>
> I know; I read that before. I think that does not alloq GPLv3.
> Section 7 of GPLv3 allows some limited variation in the licenses of
> derivative works, so it does not fit the criterion.
>
> So I think we have a real problem here.
>
> Who runs the site?
EmacsWiki? http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/AlexSchroeder
- Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs, Richard Stallman, 2009/11/22
- Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs, Karl Fogel, 2009/11/22
- Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs, Jay Belanger, 2009/11/23
- Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs, Richard Stallman, 2009/11/25
- Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs, Karl Fogel, 2009/11/25
- Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs, Richard Stallman, 2009/11/26
- Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/25
- Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs, Lennart Borgman, 2009/11/25