Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs

[Jay Belanger]

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

>       This work is licensed to you under version 2 of the GNU General Public
>       License.  Alternatively, you may choose to receive this work under any
>       other license that grants the right to use, copy, modify, and/or
>       distribute the work, as long as that license imposes the restriction
>       that derivative works have to grant the same rights and impose the
>       same restriction. For example, you may choose to receive this work
>       under the GNU Free Documentation License, the CreativeCommons
>       ShareAlike License, the XEmacs manual license, or similar licenses."
>
>     So that allows the GPLv3, as well as many other licenses.
>
> I know; I read that before.  I think that does not alloq GPLv3.

But BzrForEmacsDevs is documentation, and it does allow the GFDL.