[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: delete-selection-mode
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: delete-selection-mode |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:56:27 -0400 |
If people are unfamiliar with `delete-selection-mode' and do not want to
make it
the default behavior, fine. But please do not mess with the behavior of
`delete-selection-mode'. It does not need to be "fixed".
If some users like `delete-selection-mode' as it stands, there is no
reason to change it.
This discussion was started as a response to requests from beginners.
Enabling `delete-selection-mode' by default was proposed as a way to
satisfy them. But if we change the default, we don't have to use
`delete-selection-mode'. We could use something different for this
purpose if it is more suitabe.
- Re: delete-selection-mode, (continued)
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Richard Stallman, 2010/03/19
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Chong Yidong, 2010/03/19
- RE: delete-selection-mode, Drew Adams, 2010/03/19
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/03/22
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Richard Stallman, 2010/03/23
- RE: delete-selection-mode, Drew Adams, 2010/03/18
- Re: delete-selection-mode,
Richard Stallman <=
- RE: delete-selection-mode, Drew Adams, 2010/03/19
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Juri Linkov, 2010/03/19
- RE: delete-selection-mode, Drew Adams, 2010/03/19
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Richard Stallman, 2010/03/19
- RE: delete-selection-mode, Drew Adams, 2010/03/19
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Richard Stallman, 2010/03/20
- RE: delete-selection-mode, Drew Adams, 2010/03/20
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Jason Rumney, 2010/03/18
- RE: delete-selection-mode, Drew Adams, 2010/03/18
- Re: delete-selection-mode, David Kastrup, 2010/03/19