Re: Selection changes in revno 100822

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 14:32:18 +0100
> From: David De La Harpe Golden <address@hidden>
> CC: Miles Bader <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> 
> On 14/08/10 14:27, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >> From: Miles Bader<address@hidden>
> >> Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 22:23:38 +0900
> >>
> >> Eli Zaretskii<address@hidden>  writes:
> >>>> No, if you select text with "C-@<movement", it doesn't (you have to do
> >>>> "C-w" to get it in the primary)
> >>>
> >>> The last part, about C-w, is with x-select-enable-primary non-nil,
> >>> right?  With the default nil value, IIUC, C-w should _not_ put text
> >>> into primary, just into the clipboard.  That's what I understand from
> >>> Jan's explanations.
> >>
> >> It's with "emacs -Q"
> >
> > Then it sounds like I misunderstood Jan, or maybe some other factor
> > (transient-mark-mode?) is at work here.
> >
> 
> That would be Chong Yidong's third way "select-active-regions => lazy" 
> kicking in I think.

Does that mean that x-select-enable-primary being nil is only
effective (in preventing setting the primary selection) when
select-active-regions is nil?