|
From: | Jan Djärv |
Subject: | Re: Locks on the Bzr repository |
Date: | Sat, 21 Aug 2010 10:36:25 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; sv-SE; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 |
Uday S Reddy skrev 2010-08-21 00.41:
Seems to me that you are reinforcing Stephen's point. With bound branches, your branch is locked up until the commit goes through. You can't do anything while you have uncommitted changes in your source. With unbound branches, we can continue working on the source even when push is running in the background, because the source tree doesn't have any uncommitted changes. We can also give up on the push if necessary and continue committing to the branch. The advantage seems quite clear to me.
You are ignoring the fact that work usually doesn't happen in the bound branch, but in a separate task branch. We can continue to work there while the bound branch commits. I don't see much difference.
Jan D.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |